[FUGSPBR] OFF-Topic -> MS

[guilherme komel]

Microsoft Uses Open-Source Code
Despite Denying Use of Such Software
By LEE GOMES
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


Microsoft Corp., even while mounting a new campaign against open-source
software, has quietly been using such free computer code in several major
products, as well as on key portions of a popular Web site -- despite
denying last week that it did so.

Software connected with the FreeBSD open-source operating system is used in
several places deep inside several versions of Microsoft's Windows software,
such as in the "TCP/IP" section that arranges all connections to the
Internet. The company also uses FreeBSD on numerous "server" computers that
manage major functions at its Hotmail free e-mail service, whose registered
users exceed 100 million and make it one of the Web's busiest sites.

The Campaign Against Linux Is Uphill Battle for Microsoft (June 14)

Linux, Maverick of Computing, Gains Respectability With Firms (April 9)

Microsoft acknowledged its repeated use of open-source code Friday, in
response to questions about the matter. Just two days earlier, it had
specifically denied the existence of any such software at Hotmail.

"Open-source" programs, such as the popular Linux operating system, are
typically free and allow users to view and modify blueprint-like
instructions known as source code. The growing popularity of such software
is among the most potent competition for some of Microsoft's products, and
for a new technology it has proposed called Microsoft.NET.

In recent statements, Microsoft executives have argued that open-source
software is dangerous to companies using it, in large part because of the
licensing provisions that accompany the software. Microsoft Vice President
Craig Mundie, for example, said in a recent speech that all open-source
software "has inherent security risks and can force intellectual property
into the public domain."

But Microsoft's statements Friday suggest the company has itself been taking
advantage of the very technology it has insisted would bring dire
consequences to others. "I am appalled at the way Microsoft bashes open
source on the one hand, while depending on it for its business on the
other," said Marshall Kirk McKusick, a leader of the FreeBSD development
team.

While not as well-known as Linux, FreeBSD has a strong following in the
technical community. Much of Microsoft's use of the software at Hotmail was
uncovered Thursday evening by Trevor Johnson, a FreeBSD developer in Los
Angeles who used standard Internet monitoring tools to check on the
computers at Hotmail. Mr. Johnson said he acted because he was skeptical of
Microsoft's claim, in a Wall Street Journal article Thursday, that there was
no FreeBSD left at the service.

When Microsoft moved to buy Hotmail in 1997, it was already running on
FreeBSD, and continued to do so for several years, a source of some
embarrassment to Microsoft. The company had earlier said, though, that it
removed all FreeBSD from Hotmail last summer, and even has a lengthy
technical paper on its Web site describing the transition.

But Friday, Microsoft conceded FreeBSD was still being used at Hotmail on
machines that track advertising and that run a crucial Internet function
known as "DNS hosting." A Microsoft spokesman said he couldn't explain why
Microsoft had given out incorrect information on the topic.

The spokesman said FreeBSD was still in use simply because the company had
yet to switch the machines over to Windows.

But one employee of the Redmond, Wash., company said Microsoft has
deliberately kept FreeBSD in parts of Hotmail because of its technical
superiority over Windows in important functions and furthermore had decided
to actually increase its reliance on FreeBSD. Many of the company's Web
sites went down much of a day in January, and this person said FreeBSD was
judged to be better than Windows at helping to prevent a recurrence of the
problem.

On Friday, several FreeBSD volunteers combing through Microsoft products,
including the new Windows 2000 operating system, found numerous instances
where Microsoft had made use of their software -- something perfectly legal
for it to do. The Microsoft spokesman, in acknowledging that fact, said it
didn't contradict the company's many recent anti-open-source statements. He
said that's because Microsoft's main objection has been to Linux, which has
a more restrictive licensing arrangement than FreeBSD.

Microsoft, though, hasn't previously suggested that there were benign forms
of open-source software, and while singling out Linux for special criticism,
has tended to criticize all open-source with the same broad brush.

In its campaign against open-source, Microsoft has been unable to come up
with examples of companies being harmed by it. One reason, said Eric von
Hippel, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor who heads up a
research effort in the field, is that virtually all the available evidence
suggests that open source is "a huge advantage" to companies. "They are able
to build on a common standard that is not owned by anyone," he said. "With
Windows, Microsoft owns them."

----
Para sair da lista envie um e-mail para majordomo em fugspbr.org
com as palavras "unsubscribe fugspbr" no corpo da mensagem.